SEVEN-DAY RENTALS: It’s a Gift; Chungking Express; Wadd: The Life & Times of John C. Holmes; Biggie and Tupac
It’s a Gift (1934) (Norman Z. McLeod)
W.C. Fields is my grandfather. To see W.C. Fields in a movie is to see my grandfather, God rest his senile soul. It’s him, from his mannerisms right down to the intonation of his voice. So, Fields’ eerie resemblance to my grandfather means that the way I view a W.C. Fields film is fairly singular, I suppose, but there’s lots for everyone to enjoy in the Fields oeuvre. With his films, you laugh occasionally, but more often you watch with a sense of bemused fascination at this strange character Fields has created. The Fields catalogue is, to put it kindly, pretty hit-and-miss. There is no definitive masterpiece in there; even classics like The Bank Dick (a very enjoyable movie, by the way) make the films of the Marx Brothers look like works of austerity and narrative discipline. My favourite W.C. Fields movie is It’s a Gift, a 73-minute movie that is basically about three or four comic set pieces strung together by the flimsiest of plots, but this movie is very funny. The height of comic invention comes during the long section where Fields simply tries to get some sleep, a scene that takes up, I kid you not, about a quarter of the film’s running time. And the inspiration doesn’t stop.
Chungking Express (1994) (Wong Kar-wai)
If you’ve been reading this blog with any regularity, you may have noticed that I have a lot of admiration for Wong Kar-wai, considering that I name-drop either him or his films in virtually every other review that I write. Chungking Express isn’t his very best work – I believe that 2046 is one of the greatest achievements in cinema, and Happy Together isn’t far behind – but if you haven’t seen any of his films, this accessible, exhilaratingly fresh film is the place to start. It’s split into two halves: in the first, a lonely cop (Takeshi Kaneshiro) attempts to create a bond with a mysterious, beautiful woman (Brigitte Lin), who stays with him for the night because she’s a drug-runner who has been double crossed. In the second, a pixieish food-stand operator (Faye Wong) falls in love with yet another lonely cop (Tony Leung Chiu-wai), and begins secretly sneaking into his apartment and re-decorating. Filmed by the great cinematographer Christopher Doyle as an intoxicating, neon-drenched evocation of city life, this simply delightful film (and ‘delightful’ is not a word I throw around casually) is at once one of the saddest and most uplifting films I’ve ever seen…and will forever change the way you listen to “California Dreamin’.”
[NOTE: The North American DVD release features an introduction and wrap-up by Quentin Tarantino. If you can stand the sight of, he offers some good insights on the film’s background and appeal…not least his correct observation that everyone who sees this film will develop a crush on Faye Wong].
Wadd: The Life & Times of John C. Holmes (1998) (Wesley Emerson)
Even if you’ve never seen a porno movie, there’s a good chance you’ve heard of John Holmes. The star of hundreds of XXX movies and supposedly the bedmate of 14,000 women (probably closer to 1,000), his fame rests largely on two things: having inspired the Dirk Diggler character in Boogie Nights, and, more importantly, being the proud owner of 13 ½ inches of raw talent. Obviously there have been a lot of documentaries about Holmes over the years, most of them little more than glorified porn films, but this film is the real thing. It covers his life as a middle-class man who entered the porn business on a lark, and sees his life and relationships crumble under his drug addiction and self-made mystique. His film work, particularly a popular series in which he played a randy detective named ‘Johnny Wadd,’ is analyzed (Boogie Nights director Paul Thomas Anderson, one of the interviewees, makes a rather tortured defense of Holmes’ acting), as is his drug abuse, marriages, and alleged involvement in the bloody Wonderland murders, but what really resonates is the portrait it paints of Holmes himself. We see archival interview footage of Holmes lying his face off about his past – Holmes was so prone to fabricating whoppers about himself that, according to some of the interviewees, he would forget what was real and what was bullshit. Near the documentary’s conclusion, we learn that he contracted HIV, but continued to appear in foreign-produced sex films without informing his co-stars of his condition. Wadd: The Life & Times of John C. Holmes is haunting in the way it presents a man who became so buried under his own image, vices, and stupidity that at the end of his life, there may not have been a human being inside any more.
[NOTE: This film is available on its own or as an extra feature accompanying the sometimes interesting but totally incoherent 2003 film Wonderland, with Val Kilmer as John Holmes. Also, beware of a severely edited R-rated version – its credited director is a certain Alan Smithee.]
Biggie and Tupac (2003) (Nick Broomfield)
If you read this blog regularly, you may have also noticed a lot of references to Nick Broomfield, a British documentary filmmaker whose films I simply cannot get enough of. He works in a first-person style that makes Michael Moore look positively slick by comparison (Broomfield, the on-air host, carries his own boom mike). Here, Broomfield investigates the murders of iconic rap artists Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls, two ex-friends who were gunned down in drive-by shootings only months apart. Despite the surplus of witnesses, no charges were ever filed, and only the most superficial of investigations took place. Biggie and Tupac is essentially a detective story, with Broomfield poking his nose into the sections of LA where a white, middle-aged British documentarian would look most out-of-place and gradually pieces together an alarming charge: that Suge Knight, the much-feared CEO of Death Row records, ordered the death of Tupac when it became clear that Tupac would be leaving Death Row and auditing it for up to $10 million, and then ordered Biggie killed to make it look like the result of gang warfare. The alleged assassins? Two off-duty officers who the LAPD were reluctant to question, in fear of a PR nightmare of epic proportions.
An alarming charge, to be sure. Whether or not you buy Broomfield’s conclusions isn’t as important as the way he comes to them – by the end of the film, there is little doubt that the LAPD’s investigation was shamefully lackluster, and that Suge Knight is one scary dude. And I have spent so much time trying to describe this conspiracy theory that I haven’t even mentioned the best part of the movie: it’s when Broomfield shows up at Suge Knight’s prison unannounced and bluffs his way into an interview.










